Home News Leg 4

The Viral Star Lake Brawl: What Happened To The Husband Who Protected His Wife From 5 Women?

• minute read
Contents

The viral video of a man aggressively fighting multiple women outside a concert venue became one of the most polarizing social media events of the year, sparking a ferocious debate over self-defense, chivalry, and the ethics of intervening in a brawl. On the surface, the narrative that exploded across platforms was simple and heroic: a husband defending his wife from a group of five female attackers. However, as is often the case with sensational viral content, the full story—and the subsequent legal reality—painted a far more complex, and ultimately troubling, picture for the man at the center of the controversy. This article delves into the specific incident, the conflicting narratives, and the definitive legal outcome that followed.

The incident, which took place in the parking lot of a major concert venue, was captured on multiple cell phones, showing a chaotic scene where a man is seen striking several women. The sheer intensity of the footage and the gender dynamics involved instantly catapulted the clip into a global talking point. As of late December 2025, the incident remains a key case study in how public perception can diverge sharply from legal findings, especially in the age of instant, unverified social media sharing.

The Star Lake Incident: Conflicting Narratives and Key Entities

The brawl occurred outside The Pavilion at Star Lake (formerly Star Lake Amphitheatre) in Burgettstown, Pennsylvania, following a Jason Aldean concert on August 9 of a recent year. The resulting viral video was quickly titled and shared with the dramatic headline, "Husband Protects Wife from 5 Women," framing the man's actions as a justifiable defense of his spouse against overwhelming odds.

The central figures and entities involved in the incident and its aftermath are:

  • The Man (The Husband): Lance Edward Hickman, 24, of Amwell, Pennsylvania. He was the individual seen in the video striking multiple women, which his supporters argued was necessary to protect his wife.
  • The Woman (The Alleged Victim): A woman named Victoria was identified in news reports as one of the individuals struck by Hickman. She reported suffering injuries, including a concussion, broken ribs, and a fractured jaw, contradicting the narrative that the man's actions were purely defensive.
  • The Venue: The Pavilion at Star Lake, Burgettstown, PA, where the Jason Aldean concert took place, is the location of the fight.
  • The Investigating Authority: Hanover Township Police Department conducted the initial investigation, with the case overseen by Washington County District Attorney Jason Walsh.
  • The Conflict: The core conflict lies between the viral narrative of "self-defense" and the official police and victim accounts of "unjustified assault."

The Viral Narrative: Self-Defense and Heroism

The immediate reaction on social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter), Reddit, and TikTok was overwhelmingly supportive of the husband. The argument was simple: a man has an absolute right, and arguably a moral duty, to protect his wife from a physical attack, regardless of the gender of the attackers. This perspective highlighted several key points:

  • Disparity of Force: The man was outnumbered by what was perceived to be five women ganging up on his wife.
  • The Castle Doctrine/Defense of Others: Supporters argued that the principle of self-defense, or the defense of a third party (in this case, a spouse), justified the use of force necessary to stop the attack.
  • Gender Irrelevance: The physical size and aggression of the attackers, not their gender, should be the only factor in determining the necessary response.

This narrative transformed the video from a chaotic brawl into a moment of modern-day chivalry, gaining millions of views and establishing "husband protects wife from 5 women" as a powerful, if incomplete, topical entity.

The Legal Reality: Charges Filed and The Assault Allegation

Despite the widespread public support for the husband, the official investigation by the Hanover Township Police and the Washington County District Attorney's office led to formal charges being filed against Lance Edward Hickman. This legal outcome is the most significant and fresh piece of information that directly challenges the viral narrative.

The police investigation concluded that Hickman's actions extended beyond the legal definition of justifiable self-defense. The victim, Victoria, came forward to the media, detailing the severity of her injuries, which included a fractured jaw, broken ribs, and a concussion.

The Official Charges Against Lance Edward Hickman

The police report and subsequent filing of charges against Hickman demonstrated that authorities viewed his actions not as a simple defense of his wife, but as an excessive and unjustified assault. The charges filed included:

  • Simple Assault: This charge is a misdemeanor in Pennsylvania, indicating an attempt to cause or intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly causing bodily injury to another.
  • Disorderly Conduct: This relates to engaging in fighting or tumultuous behavior, which the entire scene clearly constituted.
  • Harassment: A summary offense related to the physical contact and intent to alarm or annoy.

The decision to charge Hickman suggests that investigators found evidence that the level of force he used was disproportionate to the threat, or that his actions continued after the immediate threat to his wife had subsided. The legal system, unlike a viral video audience, must weigh the necessity and proportionality of force used, especially in a state like Pennsylvania with specific self-defense laws.

Self-Defense Laws and The Proportionality of Force

The entire controversy highlights the critical legal concept of proportionality of force in self-defense cases, a key entity in criminal law. Pennsylvania's self-defense law (often referred to as the "use of force in self-protection") is governed by state statute and includes a "Stand Your Ground" provision.

Pennsylvania's Self-Protection Statute

In Pennsylvania, a person is justified in using force against another when they believe that such force is immediately necessary to protect themselves against the use of unlawful force by the other person. Critically, the law dictates that the defensive force used must be proportional to the threat.

  • The Test of Necessity: Was the force immediately required to prevent harm to his wife?
  • The Test of Proportionality: Did striking a woman who was allegedly on the ground multiple times constitute a reasonable and necessary response to the initial threat, or did it become an act of assault?

Legal analysts following the case suggested that the prosecution's argument would center on the latter point: that Lance Edward Hickman's actions, particularly the repeated, forceful strikes shown in the video, crossed the line from defense into excessive force, thereby nullifying the self-defense claim and justifying the simple assault charge.

The case of the husband who protected his wife from 5 women at the Star Lake concert serves as a stark reminder that viral fame and public support do not equate to legal innocence. While the initial footage galvanized support for a man perceived as a protector, the subsequent legal action—the filing of charges for simple assault—re-centered the conversation on the legal limits of self-defense and the critical distinction between justifiable force and criminal assault.

This incident is a powerful example of how the narrative of a few seconds of video can dominate public discourse, only to be complicated by the slow, fact-based process of a criminal investigation. The entities involved—from the venue and the concert to the DA's office and the specific charges—all contribute to a complex picture far removed from the simple hero-versus-villains framing that made the video an internet sensation.

The Viral Star Lake Brawl: What Happened to the Husband Who Protected His Wife From 5 Women?
husband protects wife from 5 women
husband protects wife from 5 women

Detail Author:

  • Name : Dr. Keanu Mayert II
  • Username : hlebsack
  • Email : camryn87@upton.info
  • Birthdate : 1974-04-28
  • Address : 233 Marta Island Suite 801 Lake Linda, MT 63319
  • Phone : (323) 373-5005
  • Company : Wiegand-Hauck
  • Job : Assembler
  • Bio : Ad doloribus est unde et rem reiciendis sed. Cum doloribus possimus et cupiditate et est. Dolore ex enim quasi rem.

Socials

facebook:

instagram:

  • url : https://instagram.com/greenfeldere
  • username : greenfeldere
  • bio : Voluptatum perferendis quidem sit est ratione. Harum nam esse ut vel. Asperiores quo totam dolores.
  • followers : 124
  • following : 2498

tiktok:

  • url : https://tiktok.com/@greenfeldere
  • username : greenfeldere
  • bio : Voluptate quasi sit aut. Impedit perspiciatis laboriosam sit optio itaque.
  • followers : 2962
  • following : 1283

linkedin:

Random Posts